AML/CFT Screening – PEP, Sanctions and Warning List Checks

AML/CFT screening is the process of checking customers, beneficial owners and individuals connected to a company against sanctions, PEP status and other risk sources. At Dueveris AML, we do not stop at reviewing a tool result – we analyse alerts, verify matches, assess their relevance to risk, document decisions and support escalations in a model tailored to your organisation’s procedures, volumes and business profile.

SPEAK WITH AN EXPERT ABOUT AML/CFT SCREENING

Does Your Screening Process Generate Alerts or Support Decisions?

Screening should help identify cases requiring review quickly, not burden the team with unresolved results.

The process may need strengthening when:

The Number of Potential Matches Is Too High

The team spends most of its time on cases that, after review, do not relate to the relevant individual or entity.

Alert Analysis Is Too Manual

Analysts repeatedly check the same data, sources and documents without clear criteria for resolving matches.

Screening Takes Place Only During Onboarding

Customers are checked at the start of the relationship, but not rescreened when lists, PEP status or customer information change.

There Are No Rules for Handling Results

The organisation has not defined how to assess sanctions alerts, PEP matches, warning lists or reputational information.

Decisions Are Inconsistent

Similar matches are closed or escalated differently by different analysts.

There Is No Clear Escalation Path

The team does not know which cases require further analysis, AML Officer approval or higher-level decision-making.

Customer Data Is Insufficient to Resolve an Alert

Key information may be missing, such as date of birth, nationality, country, role within a company or ownership-structure details.

It Is Difficult to Demonstrate Why an Alert Was Closed or Escalated

Documentation does not show which information was checked, what conclusions were reached or why a particular decision was made.

A Potential Match Does Not Mean Confirmed Risk

A screening result indicates that a customer’s or entity’s information is similar to information contained in a particular source. It is not yet an AML decision. It requires identity confirmation, contextual analysis and action in line with the procedure.

Screening ResultWhat It MeansWhat Should Be Checked
Potential sanctions matchThe system identified similar informationWhether the match relates to the relevant individual or entity, considering factors such as date of birth, country, aliases and role
PEP statusThe customer may require additional due diligence measuresRelationship risk, source of funds or wealth, approval level and scope of ongoing monitoring
Warning list or reputational informationA signal requiring assessment has been identifiedThe reliability, currency and relevance of the information to the specific relationship
No matchNo result was found in the source usedDocumentation of the outcome in line with the adopted procedure

PEP status does not automatically mean declining a relationship. A potential sanctions match does not automatically mean that a customer is subject to sanctions. Every result requires proper identification, risk assessment and a documented decision.

In the event of a confirmed sanctions match, we support the analysis, documentation, and escalation of the case in line with the client’s procedures and applicable regulations, including, where relevant, the potential freezing of funds or restriction of the relationship.

What Does AML/CFT Screening at Dueveris AML Cover?

We treat screening as an analytical process – from data verification and alert handling to a documented decision or escalation.

Sanctions Screening

Checking individuals and entities against agreed sanctions lists.

PEP Screening

Establishing whether a customer or connected individual may require enhanced due diligence measures.

Family Members and Close Associates of PEPs

Assessing relationships that should be considered in the risk assessment.

Watchlists and Other Risk Sources

Reviewing information from watchlists, databases and other agreed risk sources.

Adverse Media and Reputational Information

Assessing the reliability, recency and relevance of information to the customer relationship.

Alert Handling and False Positives

Determining whether a result relates to the relevant individual or entity and documenting the decision.

Escalation of Higher-Risk Cases

Preparing materials for enhanced review and decision-making in line with the organisation’s procedures.

Ongoing Customer Rescreening

Reviewing existing relationships when customer data, PEP status, sanctions lists or other risk sources change.

Who Does Screening Cover?

The scope of screening depends on the type of relationship, the role of the individual or entity and the adopted risk policy. It should not be limited to the person signing the agreement.

Individual Customer

A person with whom the organisation starts or maintains a relationship.

Company or Other Entity

A corporate customer, counterparty or entity involved in the relationship.

Authorised Representative

A person authorised to act on behalf of the customer.

Beneficial Owner

An individual who ultimately owns or controls the company.

Director, Officer or Shareholder

A person with significant influence over the entity’s business, structure or decisions.

Attorney-in-Fact or Authorised Person

A person acting on behalf of the customer in connection with a relationship or transaction.

Depending on the process and risk level, screening may also cover counterparties and transaction parties.

How Does Dueveris AML Handle Screening Alerts?

Screening at Onboarding Is Not Enough

Screening carried out before a relationship begins only reflects the situation at that point in time. PEP status, customer data, reputational information or entries in the sources used may change during the relationship.

For this reason, the process should also include rescreening of existing customers and connected persons, together with clear rules for responding to new alerts. This allows the organisation to assess changes in risk appropriately and take action in line with its procedures.

Technology Identifies the Alert – Dueveris AML Assesses the Risk

A screening tool searches data sources and identifies potential matches. It does not determine whether the result relates to the right person, what it means for the customer relationship or what action should be taken.

TechnologyDueveris AML Specialist
Searches lists and data sourcesVerifies whether the match is genuine
Detects similar dataAnalyses factors such as date of birth, country, role and aliases
Generates an alertAssesses its relevance to AML/CFT risk
Updates source dataDecides whether to close, investigate further or escalate
Supports high-volume processingDocuments the rationale and ensures consistent decisions

Technology supports the scale of the process. Expert analysis turns an alert into a well-founded decision.

How Can Dueveris AML Support Your Screening Process?

Ongoing Alert Handling

Continuous analysis of PEP, sanctions, adverse media and warning-list alerts.

Backlog Support

Support with outstanding alerts, periodic reviews and sudden increases in volume.

Screening Within KYC and KYB Processes

Verification of individuals, companies, representatives and beneficial owners before a relationship begins.

Customer Rescreening

Analysis of new alerts concerning existing customers and connected persons after onboarding.

Decision Quality Assurance

Review of alert handling, team calibration and identification of the most common errors.

Screening Process Improvement

Design of prioritisation, documentation, escalation and result-handling rules within the tools used.

How Do We Measure Screening Quality?

We assess screening quality not only by the number of alerts handled, but also by decision accuracy, response times and documentation quality.

AreaWhat We Measure
VolumeNumber of alerts handled by type and priority
TimelinessAnalysis time, SLA performance and backlog size
Decision outcomesShare of false positives, escalations and cases requiring reassessment
Decision qualityConsistency of outcomes and completeness of rationales
DocumentationPresence of sources, identifying data and decision rationale
Risk trendsMost common alert types and changes affecting the customer portfolio

AML/CFT Screening and Other Dueveris AML Services

Screening is one element of an AML/CFT framework. It supports risk assessment, but does not replace a full review of an individual, business or transaction.

ServicePrimary Purpose
AML/CFT ScreeningPEP, sanctions and watchlist screening, including alert handling
Individual KYC VerificationAssessment of an individual customer and relationship risk
Business KYB VerificationAnalysis of a company, its representatives, ownership structure and beneficial owners
AML/CFT Transaction MonitoringAnalysis of customer activity and transaction alerts
AML/CFT OutsourcingOperational delivery of agreed AML/CFT processes
External AML OfficerOversight of risk, procedures, governance and expert decision-making

Need a team that turns PEP and sanctions alerts into well-founded decisions?

Let’s discuss a screening model tailored to your customers, procedures, tools and risk profile.

Email Us

office@dueverisaml.pl

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Are PEP screening and sanctions screening the same thing?

    No. PEP screening identifies whether a customer or connected person may require enhanced due diligence measures. Sanctions screening checks against applicable sanctions lists. Both processes can be managed within one screening model.

    Does PEP status automatically mean declining the relationship?

    No. PEP status requires a risk assessment and measures set out in the procedure, such as the appropriate approval level, source of wealth or source of funds analysis, and enhanced ongoing monitoring.

    Does a potential match mean that the customer is subject to sanctions?

    No. An alert only indicates similar data. It must be confirmed whether the result relates to the relevant individual or entity, then assessed and handled in line with the procedure.

    Should screening include beneficial owners?

    Yes, particularly for corporate customers. The scope should cover individuals who ultimately control the entity, as well as other persons relevant to the risk assessment, such as authorised representatives or attorneys-in-fact.

    Can you handle alerts in our system?

    Yes. We work in the tools used by your organisation, in line with the agreed access scope, procedure and escalation model.

    Do you conduct rescreening of existing customers?

    Yes. We support periodic and event-driven rescreening of customers, companies and connected persons when new alerts arise or information within the relationship changes.

    Do you analyse adverse media and reputational information?

    Yes. We assess agreed sources for the reliability, recency and relevance of information to the specific customer relationship.

    Can you take over an alert backlog?

    Yes. We structure outstanding cases, set priorities, analyse alerts and prepare documented decisions or escalations.

    Can you help design a screening-alert handling procedure?

    Yes. We help define the screening scope, data sources, prioritisation rules, resolution criteria, documentation standards and escalation paths.

    Have More Questions?

    Speak with an Expert